Building the bridge to a national health service

March 11, 2017

Stew Jenkins

OPINION by STEW JENKINS

In their head-over-heals rush to throw the nation backwards, Republicans are about to provoke the California bear out of hibernation to build its own model for a national health service, like every other industrialized nation has built.

The last time California tried this, 73 percent of voters rejected the proposition. But that was 1994; prosperous times, when health care cost was modest compared to what it is in 2017. Now the cost of staying well siphons off 17 percent of every dollar in the economy – everyone’s economy.

On March 23, 2010, when President Obama was able to sign the Patient Protection and Affordable Care Act (the ACA), there was one thing everyone agreed on.

Whether it was democratic-socialist Bernie Sanders of Vermont, or republican Jim Inhofe of Oklahoma, everyone agreed that it was not good enough. President Obama described the law as a step forward. A step short of the universal coverage he saw as the nation’s ultimate goal. But a step toward achieving the “fifth Freedom” Franklin Roosevelt and Harry Truman sought to assure.

Compromises left the ACA with no “Medicare-for-all” option, no controls over drug company prices, and a system preserving and subsidizing the health insurance industry to bring those behemoths on board. In giving individual states the power to set up their own health care exchanges and expand Medicaid, the lead authors never expected that the majority of republican governors and legislatures would turn down local control or free federal money that would improve the health of their citizens.

But in California, the governor, legislature, and citizenry embraced and built a successful state exchange that has served as a major step toward universal health coverage. By Valentine’s Day this year, Covered California records showed that more than 412,000 new people had enrolled in 2017 than had been covered in 2016.

Even with the Trump administration taking steps to end adverting for new enrollment, the number of folks without health insurance had reached a record low in California.

In fact, it was a woman who spent her formative years in Los Osos and Cal Poly who helped build Covered California’s successful system under the ACA, Ms. Kathleen Keeshen, appointed as deputy director, (in plain English, second in command of the program) to the Board of Directors when Covered California was being stood up. With Mitch McConnell, Paul Ryan, and President Trump’s concerted effort to destroy the Affordable Care Act this month, you will not be surprised that Ms. Keeshen flew out Monday to the District of Columbia for conferences about what the State of California is facing.

No doubt about it, we are facing a collapse in confidence and a breakdown in the federal structures that helped California stand up one of the best working health insurance systems in America. Everywhere it exists a single-payer health care system is less expensive, more efficient, and keeps people healthier longer. This fact cannot seem to penetrate the blind spot of the “free market” zealots, McConnell, Ryan and Trump.

In 1994, the legislature found the funding for a universal California health care plan, an income taxes on corporations and the super wealthy. Then it was rejected by the electorate. But propping up Covered California without federal subsidies and mandates will require revisiting a progressive income tax.

If the public is to consider taxing themselves, the cheaper, more efficient and more effective single-payer should be our state’s goal. Either way, the experience of folks like General Counsel Keeshen will be needed to preserve or build California’s health care system.

Prudent preparation to replace the federal structure and funding takes more than marches. Under the arcane rules of the California Legislature, state representatives have a short time in which to introduce a bill. And, when the Republican Congress and President don’t even know how they are going to gut the Affordable Care Act, setting up a state replacement in the few months allowed for introducing state legislation presents a challenge.

There are two California senators who are doing more than marching. Ricardo Lara, of Long Beach, and Toni Atkins, of San Diego, did not wait. They’ve introduced Senate Bill 526, entitled Californians For a Healthy California.

Short as it is, by proposing that it is “the intent of the Legislature to enact legislation that would establish a comprehensive universal single-payer health care coverage program and a health care cost control system for the benefit of all residents of the state,” it presents the California Legislature with the legislative spine from which to build out a universal California health service available to every resident during the upcoming two-year legislative session. Senator Lara and Atkins deserve support for seeing that something needed to be done to preserve our state’s options.

But they will need more than that. They will need your support and ideas on how to structure and pay for a California health care system.

You can help by sending letters and calls of support to Senator Ricardo Lara, State Capitol, Room 5050, Sacramento, CA 95814; Phone: (916) 651-4033.  And send letters and calls of support to Senator Toni Atkins, State Capitol, Room 4072, Sacramento, CA 95814; Phone: (916) 651-4039; Fax: (916) 651-4939.

More importantly, send copies of those letters of support to our own state senator and assemblyman. Democrat, Bill Monning, needs to know you support a California single-payer health system at his address: State Capitol, Room 313, Sacramento, CA 95814; Phone: (916) 651-4017; Fax: (916) 651-4917.  So does Republican, Jordan Cunningham, 1150 Osos Street, Suite 207, San Luis Obispo, CA 93401; 805-549-3381.

And, for your neighbor Jordan Cunningham, it might be helpful to remind him what another good Republican, Ohio Governor John Kasich, said to a Republican legislator when he was trying to expand Medicaid under the ACA.

“I respect the fact that you believe in small government. I do, too. I also know that you’re a person of faith,” Kasich said. “Now, when you die and get to the meeting with St. Peter, he’s probably not going to ask you much about what you did about keeping government small. But he is going to ask you what you did for the poor. You better have a good answer.”

A single-payer state plan is not just for the poor, it will provide effective health care for all at less cost for all. Now is the right time for California to lead the way.


Loading...
39 Comments
Inline Feedbacks
View all comments

This should be titled “Building the Bridge to Higher Taxes”. There is no free lunch, folks.


When did anyone say free? Obviously we need more education.


Yes, we need more education on ethics…where they can teach you voting to steal your neighbor’s stuff is still wrong even if you think it’s ‘fair.’


I think too many people confuse Medical Care, with Medical Insurance, Care is what you receive from from a doctor, PA, or a nurse, Insurance you buy from a company to protect yourself from a loss you cannot afford. Insurance should not pay for check ups, babies (unless something goes wrong), birth control, etc. Think car insurance, that doesn’t pay for oil changes, wiper blades, tires, etc. The more people you put between you and a medical provider will up the cost dramatically. Many years ago you just bargained with the doctor, then we placed insurance companies between the patient and the doctor, then we put the government between the patient and the Insurance company. Now this clown wants to remove the Insurance company. At least the insurance company had a reason to try to make you happy, they didn’t want to lose your business. The government has no such worries.


I don’t want national socialist health care. Govt is the worst and most expensive way to ‘solve’ problems.


” Govt is the worst and most expensive way”


You think your bill will gown down with privatization? Lol Corporations will always charge more, check you PG&E bill for proof.


Do I think the price will go down with privatization? Probably. If we get the govt out of it.

Do I think the price will go up and the quality will go down with national socialist health care? Darn right. No competition. No responsibility.

And with multiple companies offering insurance I can choose who I deal with. Choice is good. One size does not fit all.


Here’s a dirty little secret about the affordable care act that the big government crowd never brings up. Because eligibility for the subsidies is determined by income and income alone, wealthy people, sometimes with millions of dollars, who are retired but who are not yet old enough for Medicare keep their income below the 4x poverty line threshold and collect the government welfare subsidies that you and I pay for.


How do I know this? I advise them to do it.


The are only two (2) key questions: 1) Why does Mr. Jenkins feel the need to have his picture taken before a shelf filled with Barclays’ legal books? 2) What became of the United States of America?


President Roosevelt made it very clear in the 1930’s/40’s that if we fail to work together for the common good, then every American is going down with the ship.


Well, we are sinking—just in the case those of you have failed to notice the water about your ankles rapidly raising towards your knees…


My God have Mercy on our Souls!


Your choice of questions and a dependency on a nothing to do with reality cult, shows why we are in such a pickle.


Don’y worry ElTrumpo will save us, after his next golf game (9 games in 7 weeks).


Yet again Stewart you prove that you have a big heart and a small brain. Your idea of a universal health care plan for California which covers everyone, including illegal aliens, at cheaper rates than current private health insurance is folly. For this plan to work and to remain viable it will require additional payroll taxes taken from workers and employers as is currently done under Social Security and Medicare plans.

People who have the financial means to leave the state will simply leave and move to another state with a lower overall tax burden. This leaves behind the working middle class, the working poor, and people who have never paid, nor will ever pay anything into this system, but who will enjoy all of the same benefits.

The result will be that the rates will increase and fall squarely on the middle class and working poor and on whatever employers should remain within the state.

The very economic class that you hoped you would be able to tax to pay a large portion of the cost for this plan, people like me, will simply relocate to a low-tax state such as Wyoming, Nevada, South Dakota or Texas.

We will still maintain vacation homes on the Central Coast, because we can afford to and we will enjoy all the benefits and beauty of this region without paying the taxes or the healthcare costs of all of the people who can’t afford to pay for it themselves.

In short your plan will hurt people in the middle class and the working poor through an ever-increasing payroll deduction to keep the system solvent.

The other part of this gloomy forecast is that Healthcare will be rationed or scheduled in a manner so as to control costs from one fiscal year to the next. You won’t be getting that knee replacement when you wanted it done.

You’ll be getting it done when it is absolutely necessary and after all other treatments and management solutions have been exhausted; probably at the start of the next fiscal year. If you doubt that this will become reality go talk to a Canadian who has traveled all the way to Samsun clinic to get work done because they’re on a waiting list back in British Columbia.


“…people like me, will simply relocate to a low-tax state such as Wyoming, Nevada, South Dakota or Texas.”


Good! Get gone! Who the f*** needs folks like you anyway? Take your money and your taxes and go play in someone else’s yard, ya big crybaby! And take all your playmates with you! Maybe then we can get property values to where common working folks like me can afford to have a home in the state I was born in, in the county I love without the likes of you and your “kind” ballooning those values that restrict home ownership or rentals to only include your “kind”!


And to your contention that Canadian’s wait longer for health care? If you read the complete story on that you’ll find it is largely dictated on where you live in that country! Some providences have wait times that are lower than ours for similar needs and some that have much higher, it’s predicated on where you live. Another thing; I’ve researched this claim that folks like you put out about this length of time contention and the most prevalent information I have found is there is NO prevalent information out there to come to any definitive conclusion! Much like any other “political football” it bounces whatever way your political leanings dictate.


Let us know when you’re leaving and we’ll see about a farewell sendoff suitable to your kind; a boot in the ass and never come back party!


Stu, why don’t you just come out and say it, California needs to be it’s own country. That way, all you said can be true. Also, the new country of California can own all of its unfunded mandates, its massive debt, its over regulations, tax the daylights out of its citizens and corporations, support all of illegal Immigrants it wants, any way it wants etc. etc. You would have your single payer medical, all the bullet trains you wanted, all the retirement funding you needed. California could then create its own trade deals with Mexico and now the United States of America. Country California could then pay for all of its infrastructure, disaster recovery Without the help of the United States. But everyone would have healthcare, the best of any country in the world. What do you all think? Personally, I would move out of here asap.


Considering California pay’s far more to the Feds in taxes then we receive, we would be fine.


” Personally, I would move out of here asap.” Bull.


If medical care is so great under socialism why do people go to other countries for Their care. I had a relative in Germany that was struck by lightening right away the German Dr. Was going to amputate his leg he went Switzerland his leg was kept intact. A friend had blood clots in her lung once she was stabilized the put her in a wheel chatr sent her home and told her husband you will have to quit work and take care of her.that was eleven years ago.If this is the type of medical care you want move over there but don’t force socialism on is.


“Your logical fallacy is anecdotal You used a personal experience or an isolated example instead of a sound argument or compelling evidence.

It’s often much easier for people to believe someone’s fear as opposed to understanding complex data and variation.”


Written like a true progressive utopian! Reality is far different.