SLO police want charges against man who found chief’s gun

August 13, 2019

Skeeter Mangan

The San Luis Obispo Police Department referred its investigation into the man who found the chief’s gun in a bathroom to the District Attorney’s Office for consideration of charges on Monday. [Cal Coast Times]

Police are asking prosecutors to consider charging Skeeter Mangan of Los Osos with grand theft of a firearm, possession of stolen property and carrying a loaded firearm in public.  Prosecutors have not yet taken a position on the request, according to District Attorney Dan Dow.

“The District Attorney’s Office is obligated under law to review this investigation, and all of the evidence contained in the investigation, in order to make a determination of whether a crime was committed and whether there is sufficient evidence to prove the crime, and if so, whether it would be in the interest of justice to pursue charges,” Dow said in an email.

At about noon on July 10, Chief Deanna Cantrell left her pistol in the bathroom of an El Pollo Loco restaurant. A short time later, Mangan walked into the bathroom and discovered the loaded and unattended firearm on top of a toilet paper dispenser.

Mangan put the gun in his pocket, left the restaurant, rode his moped scooter home, and put the firearm in a dresser drawer.

After spotting Mangan on the news on July 11, as the person suspected of having the chief’s gun, Mangan’s brother-in-law, Sean Greenwood, drove to Los Osos to ask Mangan about the firearm.

“My dear brother-in-law not only found a loaded and chambered Glock (a pistol with only one safety, on the trigger) in a public restroom, he removed it moments before a 10-year-old boy entered the room,” Greenwood said. “I asked my brother-in-law about what had happened, he explained to me he didn’t know what to do with the gun so he placed it in a drawer and contemplated how to find the owner.”

Greenwood then called the SLO Police Department and spoke with a dispatcher who sent officers to Los Osos to collect the firearm. The officers thanked Greenwood and Mangan, and said they did not plan to charge Mangan based on Penal Code 485, Greenwood said.

According to Penal Code 485, a person is guilty of theft if they find property, and appropriate the property for their own use, “without first making reasonable and just efforts to find the owner and to restore the property to the owner.”

It was only after reading a Tribune article that claimed Greenwood turned his brother-in-law in, that Mangan’s family discovered the police department had asked the SLO County District Attorney’s Office to consider charging Mangan with possession of a stolen firearm.

“Little did Skeeter know, he would be ridiculed and labeled by media and some, to me, quite broken souls commenting about his appearance. When really, if you stop and think about it, he quite possibly saved a child’s life by removing the firearm,” Greenwood said.


Leave a Reply

Please Login to comment

Perhaps Mr. Mangan upon finding the abandoned firearm removed the magazine and ejected the chambered round. So it wasn’t a loaded firearm.


Double down SLOPD. Circle the wagons. The cover up is always worse than the crime!

Don’t fall for it Dan Dow!


I knew it. Why doesn’t the DA charge everyone south of the Grade? Hell, they may get lucky and catch some real criminals, or at least some they can frame. The stench of corruption is unbelievable. The Feds must become involved and clean out this cesspool

Kevin Rice

How is a $400 pocket pistol “grand theft” ($950 or more)??? Ridiculous.


To Chief Cantrell,

Please do the right thing and put a stop to this. Don’t attempt to salvage your reputation or your job by wreaking havoc on an innocent persons life. I urge you to look deep and do the right thing and stop this miscarriage of justice. I know you are better than that.


I don’t think she is “better than that.”


Are they charging the chief with negligent storage of a firearm? If not, why not?


In California, a person commits criminal storage of a firearm in the third degree by keeping or leaving a loaded firearm in a place where the defendant knows (or should have known) that a child under the age of 18 is likely to gain access to the gun without permission of the child’s parent or guardian, and the defendant does not take reasonable steps to secure the firearm. (Cal. Penal Code §§ 25100, 25105.)

Leaving a loaded firearm in a public restroom would certainly appear to constitute criminal storage of a firearm in the third degree. Charges are in order.

“Skeeter” appears to have stored her firearm in a safer manner than the chief did.


How about a 2 day suspension without pay? Seems like a fair punishment to me. Or is that special treatment for special people? I said to myself upon reading this story that the person who found the unattended firearm would suffer a more severe penalty than the person who lost the firearm. 2 classes of people.


Is Chief Cantrell going to be charged for lying and not following established protocols?


Oh boy, here we go. Poor guy is going to get railroaded to deflect heat from the Chief. What a travesty.


They are going to keep up the heat and overcharge everybody as a basis for negotiation. The victims need to get good attorneys, take no deals, and fight in criminal and civil court.

1 2 3 4