Political correctness during racial unrest

October 24, 2020

Michael Rivera

OPINION By MICHAEL RIVERA

I’m Michael Rivera. I’m an American citizen.

When it comes to how much to value my political opinion, that’s all you need to know about me. If you want to call me Latino or Hispanic, go ahead. I’m OK with that. I call myself American.

I suppose I’m a minority, but everyone is a minority of some sort. I am not a Person of Color. I don’t know what that means, and I think it’s a term that divides us instead of bringing us together. There is way too much “Us versus Them,” too much identity apartheid, in today’s political rhetoric.

I did one of those DNA tests, and my ethnicity estimate is 37 percent from Spain and 23 percent from Indigenous Americas for starters. Then there’s the 17 percent from Ireland and Scotland, 6 percent Basque, 5 percent from France, and 3 percent European Jewish. Finish (no, not Finnish) it off with a smattering of 1 percent traces, including Northern Africa, Mali, the Andes and the Middle East.

Now I know that these tests are not definitive. They measure the appearance of genetic markers in current populations in various places and make assumptions that those markers have been there for a few centuries.

My Native American ancestors were here for thousands of years, but before that their ancestors were living in Asia, so it’s interesting, but maybe it doesn’t matter.

And that’s my point — it doesn’t matter.

I don’t want any additional rights because my formerly European family has been here since the 1600s or because my Native American family has been here long before that. I don’t expect more privileges or fewer privileges because of my ethnic pedigree or melanin content.

As an American citizen, I’m entitled to one vote, just as is the American citizen who was naturalized yesterday. I want my one vote, and I don’t want anyone else to have more than one vote.

America is always a work in progress, but it’s a wonderful country, and that’s why so many people want to come here.

I don’t blame people for wanting to come here, but the rule of law is one of the reasons this is a great nation, and if we don’t control our borders, we have no rule of law and, eventually, will have no country. I think my Mexican cousins and my Irish cousins both have to play by the rules.

Since many immigrants come from Latin America and Asia, and since most illegal immigrants come from south of the border, anyone who thinks we should enforce our laws against illegal immigration or reduce legal immigration is called a racist.

Why? Because it’s easier to dismiss someone with an epithet than it is to engage in a discussion about an appropriate immigration policy.

We should be proud that we have built a country so attractive to others across the world. But there are almost 8 billion people on the planet, and they can’t all live in the United States. We have an obligation to look after our neighbors and fellow citizens first.

I think we can do a better job of that, and protecting our environment, and rebuilding our infrastructure, if we reduce immigration. So you can call me a racist for that, too, although it turns out that a couple of national commissions have studied the issue and agreed with me.

E pluribus unum — “Out of many, one.” It’s a motto that has built this nation. You can agree or disagree with me on a proper immigration policy, but we can discuss our differences without the ugly name-calling that is so common to these debates.

Call me politically incorrect for supporting immigration cuts. I’m OK with that. Look at my DNA results again. I’m the United Nations of political incorrectness … and proud to be an American.

Michael Rivera is a Paso Robles resident who has lived on the Central Coast for more than 48 years.


Loading...
22 Comments
Inline Feedbacks
View all comments

Well said, Michael.


Very nice piece Mr. Rivera. Truthful, accurate, and to the point of reality.


Who is calling you a racist for advocating reduced immigration? Desiring a functioning immigration system that limits or reduces immigration is not racist. It advocating a policy. Sadly, your article implies that others perceive you as racist. I find this hard to believe. Do you binge listen to talk radio or the diatribe commentators on Fox? Repeating their language can give a false impression.


We already have laws that limits or reduces immigration. Your right, it is not racist. It should be if you support those laws, your following the rule of law for the nation. Those who stand in this have indeed been called racist or bigots for standing in the immigration laws of this land. It’s very shallow minded and a weak thought process to blame it on talk radio or Fox news.


Those who want to purposely confuse legal immigration,(I 100% support) with illegal immigration are the ones TRULY promoting a false diatribe and inaccurate impression regarding immigration. Mr. Rivera’s point is true. Those of use who oppose illegal immigration are often called racist and bigots. I have no problem with people who want to migrate to our wonderful country. Just do it legally. Is that too much to ask?


If this gentleman doesn’t know what “person of color” means, perhaps he can look it up. It’s a nonwhite person. Thanks, and best wishes to all.


Why don’t you specifically tell us? Let’s say there are 100 shades of white to black, with the whitest white being zero and the blackest black black being 100. Where is the line of demarcation? At 1, 7, 14, 22, 50?


You can see how silly this is, and why one can say, “I don’t even know what that means.”


So if a person is half white and half black are they a person of color?


I wonder if George Floyd thought “it doesn’t matter” as a white cop kneeled on his neck for nearly nine minutes?


I wonder what he thought when he resisted arrest, or when he willingly put illicit drugs into his body, or when he tried to pass a counterfeit bill. It is certainly a tragedy that he lost his life, but the case is more complex than what you have concluded it is. It was not about race…it was an encounter that involved use of force on a resistant subject that was under the influence of multiple drugs in a state of excited delirium (look it up, just not on Wikipedia because they don’t care about facts, only politics).


Since you can only speak for yourself, my mother would call your screen name a “bed pan wee”. As for myself, I would have to say that there are multiple falsehoods in your statement above. For instance, it was made clear from the videos of the incident, that Mr. Floyd had not been resisting arrest. It was also not determined that he was attempting to pass a counterfeit bill. Since he remained on scene to have the bill verified by LE, it is highly unlikely he thought he was passing a fake. As for his mental state, I would suggest consulting some other actual news sources, rather than those who went to court for the right to say whatever they pleased.


Only a fan of extrajudicial executions would post such an inaccurate and intensely biased statement. The man, knowing he was dying, pleaded for his mother. Watch the footage, including the part where he is not resisting. Then tell us how righteous of a killing you still think that may have been. I am quite positive that I do not wish to have a police force that wields that kind of life and death power over me.


My Mother would say, “you crawl through the gutter, you’re going to get dirty” .


Or when he threatened a pregnant woman and held a knife to her belly.


SO, you take some media source as enough proof to condemn him to death? And apparently anyone in a blue uniform is qualified to make that judgement, based on whatever he might believe about the person on whom he presses his weight? Not very American, that. More KKK. But I guess that you would be willing, then, to allow whomever stopped you in the street to exercise the same judge, jury and executioner power over you, should an opportunity arise? So, “innocent until proven guilty” is just a lot of BS to you? Either you believe in upholding our legal system, or you do not. Which is it?


Francesca, I am not condemning him to death as you say, in fact I don’t believe any commenters are doing that. In fact, police are there to investigate crime and make arrests, not act as judge and jury. It appears that the system in the Floyd case is working as it should. That police officer will spend his waning years in prison, my guess.


On the other hand, let’s not canonize Floyd and make him out to be some sort of MLK or John Lewis character, like many in the media has been doing.


“Race shouldn’t matter but also look at my race when judging my bad opinions about immigration.”


Race doesn’t matter to me, it’s a matter of culture. Certain cultures value certain things and humans gravitate toward the culture that has values that align with theirs. Call me a culturalist, I guess.


What a refreshing piece you wrote Mr. Rivera. A very truthful from the heart response to the opposing divisive points of view that are forced on us often. I thank you for boldly saying you are “American” first and foremost. I agree. When you place any ethnicity in front of “American” is divisive and destructive by itself as we’ve all sadly have seen. Nothing more than political correctness bigotry.


I don’t know you, but I would bet you are a very strong family man, kind, caring, respectful, full of joy, you love you life, and very thankful for what you have. We do live in the greatest country in the world. We all have the open opportunity at individual success. The choice is ours. It’s great to see you chose to be a victor, instead of a victim. Thanks again for you words of truth, honor and encouragement. May God abundantly bless you and your family.


I’m a biologist. Race is the same as breed. The only extant “race” of humans on earth today is “Homo sapiens sapiens,” (the scientific name of today’s humans) as far as I know. I’ve read articles that state there maybe another “race” of humans on the island of New Guinea. Skin color doesn’t determine race.


People should identify, judge, and treat others as individuals, not as groups.