San Luis Obispo County pushed Dan DeVaul to sell Sunny Acres

September 12, 2021

By JOSH FRIEDMAN

Amid its ongoing spat with SLO rancher Dan DeVaul, San Luis Obispo County reportedly pushed for the sale of DeVaul’s property to a Santa Margarita couple, a deal DeVaul has rejected.

DeVauls’s 72-acre ranch lies on the outskirts of San Luis Obispo and contains his Sunny Acres sober-living facility. Sunny Acres houses and provides sober-living services to several dozen low-income residents, many of whom could otherwise face homelessness.

DeVaul and SLO County have repeatedly battled over code enforcement disputes pertaining to the property.

With the support of county officials, Cheryl and Mike Cole, of Cole Farms, were ready, willing and able to purchase Sunny Acres, Jeffrey Stein, the couple’s attorney, stated in a news release.

“Despite the anticipated buyers being ready, willing and able to complete the purchase, the cancellation of the offer to sell appears to have doomed the new team and their devotion to the recovery program and the people it has served,” Stein wrote.

The Coles’ team aimed to create a fresh start for the sober-living program at Sunny Acres and to enable it to become compliant with county and state codes, so it can remain viable in the long-term, Stein said.

District 3 County Supervisors Dawn Ortiz-Legg participated in the negotiations over the proposed sale of Sunny Acres. Ortiz-Legg sponsored a meeting with representatives of the sober-living community and worked with county staff and the prospective buyers to identify possible solutions to the existing code violations. [Tribune]

There was a plan of action involving new ownership and a team of professionals who could make the situation work. DeVaul’s rejection of the purchase offer is unfortunate, Ortiz-Legg said.

DeVaul has proven that he cannot provide safe permitted housing and safe drinking water to residents on his property, nor can he fix the non-permitted grading that impacts flood management and the environment, Ortiz-Legg said.

“While I applaud Mr. DeVaul for bringing much good to the Sunny Acres community and the people who are in their program, because of what he has done to the property over the many years and because of his continued obstinance to operate within the rules, he has created a situation which puts those individuals who rely on the property at risk and in harm’s way,” Ortiz-Legg added.

Amid a previous spat between the county and DeVaul, a 2011 order from a local judge forced the rancher to evict effectively homeless individuals who were deemed to have been staying in non-code compliant structures. Sunny Acres later went into receivership, and then in 2013, DeVaul and the county entered into a stipulated agreement requiring the rancher to comply with various regulations in order to continue his operation.

Earlier this year, neighbors made complaints to the county about Sunny Acres. Subsequently, a county official penned a letter to DeVaul stating the county suspected individuals were living in non-permitted structures on his property and that non-permitted dumping and grading activity were reportedly occurring near wetlands and Laguna Lake.

In June, the county obtained a civl inspection warrant, and code enforcers went onto DeVaul’s property, accompanied by sheriff’s deputies. During the inspection, a county official said there were obvious violations on the property, particularly non-permitted tiny homes.

DeVaul said the main residential building on his ranch was not properly permitted because Sunny Acres had been unable to bring potable water into the structure. DeVaul had sought to connect the building to the city of SLO’s water system and was reportedly refused service.

Johnny Rodriguez, the program director for Sunny Acres, said during public comment at a SLO County Board of Supervisor’s meeting in June that at total of 48 people, many of whom were elderly, infirm, mentally ill and in various stages of recovery, could be out on the streets if evicted from the property.

Nonetheless, DeVaul was ordered to provide the county with a relocation and demolition plan a couple weeks ago. County staff had delayed enforcement action on the matter to meet with Sunny Acres management, Supervisor Ortiz-Legg said.


Loading...
22 Comments
Inline Feedbacks
View all comments

When we were kids, we would ride from our ranch, across Devaul’s ranch, to the lake and let the horses play in the water. Broken farm machinery, and recently pushed around dirt (guess where that small hill behind the barn came from) have ALWAYS been there, even long before any semblance of the Laguna housing tract was developed.


The “official”, and fully government owned, operated, and funded homeless shelter on Prado, has denied every one of the ranch residents. Which is why they are at Sunny Acres in the first place!


This latest affair sounds exactly like extortion from every movie made about the mafia. It’s that obvious, and that amateur. Answer me this: Why do the Coles want this ranch, and not develop their world class homeless and sobriety society on their current property?


Odd, but i don’t read of any fights or problems there, or trash piling up in someones yard or on city sidewalks, these people are always doing something, if not working on a piece of equipment,splitting firewood,selling pumpkins,Christmas trees, they are not sleeping on the streets, yeah the place is a little messy, maybe the whiners would like to take a couple of these people in their homes to help them out.


What is odd about this is that the DeVaul property is within the limits of Rancho Laguna, a Mexican Land Grant, confirmed by the United States government, which was conveyed by Mexico to the Catholic Church for the benefit of poor people. Since this property right, (that is, the right to use the property for the poor), is guaranteed by a Treaty, (which under the Article VI of the US Constitution is the supreme law of the land), how are the County’s efforts legal?


One more article you will NEVER read in The Tribune.


Cole Farms is a trucking business,I’d like to know what that has to do with running a clean and sober program?

Something is not quite right.


Why is the county trying to force/facilitate such a sale? Is Mulholland whining again?


What’s Cole going to do with the property? Develop a gravel pit and about 400 homes?


Ortiz-Legg is Adam Hill-corrupt. The County is trying to force the sale of the land, but to a lone buyer connected to a County supervisor and nobody else? This is property likely to be annexed into the City of SLO with an accompanying huge increase in value, if the buyer is “right”, and I don’t mean right-wing politically, quite the opposite. Development corruption runs very similarly to marijuana corruption, but larger by a factor >1,000x with <1/1000 the scrutiny.


There is currently 16 sex offenders living there. They’re on the Megan’s law list, under 93405 zip code. Creepy vibe for sure!


At least the authorities know they are there unlike the thousands that they dont know where they are.


NIMBY, huh? SMH.


Where would you like these 16 individuals to live? Maybe in some tight-quartered public housing around some kids?


The restrictions (which I support) placed on sex offenders regarding where they are allowed to live can make it difficult to find housing, often leading to homelessness.


I’d rather have them at Sunny Acres where at least they are accounted for, than living in the creek bed, the park, or the bushes next to my house.


Dan DeVaul deserves a medal, in my opinion.


Bunch of crooks are running SLO County.


1 2 3