Front Page  »  

Special favors benefit SLO County supervisor, anger his neighbors

April 24, 2022

SLO County Supervisor Bruce Gibson

By KAREN VELIE

San Luis Obispo County has a reputation for rigorously enforcing building and land use regulations. But, when it came to Supervisor Bruce Gibson, county staff skirted both planning regulations and state law to allow him to build a 727-square-foot addition and 208-square-foot deck.

When the special treatment was uncovered, SLO County staff, (1) took documents from the file offline, (2) said the documents did not exist, (3) said they were not sure where the documents were and could have been lost, and, (4) that there were no documents for property exemptions for the project.

When Gibson’s home was built decades ago in Cayucos, it was placed less than 2 feet from the property line, which currently makes it a legal non-conforming structure. The minimum set back requirement is 3 feet for a conforming structure, while 4 feet is usually required.

During the process of approving the project, county documents showed a 23-inch setback.

While Gibson legally can occupy his home, SLO County Title 23.09.030, requires that a non-conforming structure be brought into compliance before it can be altered or increased.

Initially, when Gibson decided to add on to his home, he asked his next-door neighbor Jack Keely to let him buy a slice of his property for $2,000, which would have made Gibson’s home a conforming structure. Keely declined the offer, he  said.

Gibson then threatened to get a lot line adjustment, Keely said.

But no lot line adjustment was made, and, in 2016 Gibson applied to the county for a permit for a complete remodel and to add a two-story addition on to the back of his house.

That should have resulted in the county mailing notices to all neighbors within 300 feet of Gibson’s property. Keely said he never received a notice.

After learning Gibson’s remodel plan would block her home’s view of the Pacific Ocean and Morro Rock, Carol Knapp sought a hearing. She dropped her request after being told that she would likely lose her bid to stop Gibson’s project, according to records from the planning hearing on April 21, 2017.

Even though it usually takes three to four months to schedule a hearing with the planning department, Gibson’s project went in front of the hearing officer in less than six weeks.

And while projects are typically listed by the property owner’s name, in this case, Gibson’s name was not listed on the hearing calendar. Instead, the name listed was “Smith.” As a result, no one other than two county staffers attended the SLO County Planning Department hearing.

During the April 21, 2017 hearing, Terry Wahler, a county project manager, asked hearing officer Rob Fitzroy to approve Gibson’s plan for the 727 square foot addition, a 208 square-foot deck and an interior remodel. He said the project complied with all county regulations.

During his slide show, Wahler showed a drawing that lists the side setback next to Keely’s home as 23 inches, according to records on the county meeting website.

“This is an aerial of the site, and as you can see, it is a little snug on the side setbacks, but there is plenty of room for this addition in the center rear of the project site,” Wahler said during his presentation.

Saying that the project met all requirements, Fitzroy then moved to approve.

The county signed off on the project about a year and a half ago. Gibson then put a shale and concrete walkway that covered part of Keely’s property.

After Keely ordered Gibson to stop encroaching on his lot, Keely paid for a survey which showed Gibson’s encroachment. He tried to hire a lawyer to sue the county supervisor, but four attorneys turned him down noting Gibson’s position of power, he said.

Recently, Gibson had his walkway cut from Keely’s property. Keely is planning to put a fence along the property line to stop Gibson from further encroaching on his property, he said.

Jack Keely’s home

Since the project’s approval, all documents related to the project — DRC 2016-00077 — were taken offline while the permit application cover page remains on the county’s website. The few documents available, show the project was signed off on even though requirements such as having the addition setback four feet from the property line were not met.

According to California law, county planning documents are public records. In response to a request to see the permit file, planning department staffer Deanna Pategue first said the file did not exist, before saying most of the file was missing. She then provided the seven remaining file pages: the findings, conditions of approval and the notice of final county action.

“Contact the planner, he would know what he did with the records,” Pategue said.

Even though the county is legally required to retain planning records, Wahler said he was not sure where he put them, and that he doesn’t like people showing up at the desk and asking to see records.

“We cannot just find them, we have so many,” Wahler said. “What if it is lost and we can’t find it.”

Wahler called back, and said County Counsel Rita Neal said reporters can only get records through her.

In response to a Public Records Request for any exemptions the county awarded the project, and questions about the non-conforming home, Neal responded that there were no documents available and that the property was a conforming use.

“There are no documents responsive to your request because there was no exemption. The single family house is in residential zoning,” Neal wrote in an email. “According to our local coastal program, it is a principally permitted and thus a legal and conforming use.”

But the home’s zoning does not affect its status as a non-conforming structure.

Neal also falsely claimed there were no exemptions given to the project, although CalCoastNews had obtained a March 21, 2017, document which showed that Wahler gave Gibson a categorical (CEQA) exemption, according to the county document.

Gibson’s response to questions about the non-conforming structure and issues with Keely was to forward Neal’s email.

Neal then sent a second email, on Saturday afternoon, saying that her interpretation of Title 23 is that is does allow for adding on to a legal non-conforming structure.

“Proposed alterations or expansions consistent with all applicable provisions of this title (Title 23), when accompanied by any additional alterations necessary to bring the entire building or structure into conformity with all applicable provisions of Title 19 of this code.”

Title 23.09.030 requires 3 feet side setbacks.

Even though county officials say there are no issues with the project, about five county planning department employees visited Gibson’s home on Friday, Keely said.

Elected in 2006, Gibson is the longest-serving member of the SLO County Board of Supervisors. He is currently running for reelection.

Keely recently hung two large banners on his home, asking his neighbors to vote for Bruce Jones, one of Gibson’s opponents, for District 2 supervisor.


Loading...
Related:


42 Comments
Inline Feedbacks
View all comments

First I have to say I’m not a Gibson supporter!

I see a lot of shade thrown at Gibson but I think it’s misdirected and should be more about the Planning Departments incompetency!!

So getting away from the Gibson debacle lets look at another project I’m familiar with.

A few years back I was involved with another very similar project in Cayucos on Circle Dr. The neighboring house was, like here, to close to the property line, the planning department required the the property owner to do a lot line adjustment before he could build, so both properties had conforming setbacks. I didn’t think it was right at the time but that was what was required.

So the question is did the Keely project slide through without doing a lot line adjustment, Bruce tried to rectify it with Jack. Then the planning department let it go through because it was their own mistake that it was a problem at all?

As far as the project getting through so quickly, is that the Planning Department trying to cover up their incompetency with their boss, or at least the guy that approves their budget?

Chicken or the Egg, Planning Department incompetency or Bruce for allowing then to be so incompetent?


-14

So, Gibson does a work-around when he fails in steam rolling his neighbor for a sliver of land and says there’s nothing to see here folks while getting some political favors from county staff. But how can Dan Dow resist the aroma of this cover-up of the missing documents? Documents missing from the paper file is not a plausible excuse. Electronic records like scans, files, texts, emails and phone records should still be readily available and should contain triple the amount of information kept in a hard copy folder. So, not only are the county planning staff complicit for not recovering the paperwork from the electronic archives, but now the IT staff is bagged with explaining why they can’t retrieve the backed-up archives that they are required to maintain as a recovery mechanism in case of cyber intrusions and ransomware. If those archives were changed, the MetaData will spill the beans and make the IT Supervisor complicit. As for the neighbor that got her view blocked, the press should have beaten-up good neighbor Gibson about that 5 years ago. Her only hope was to spend $150-200k in civil discovery only to be forced into civil mediation where she would have to sign a NDA. I feel for the neighbor that got offered the insulting $2,000 for 13” of his lot line. That obviously was 1/5 of market value and who would waste their time for $2k? Finally, Rita Neal: If documents are missing from a High Functioning Organization/HFO, that HFO conducts an internal audit of adjacent and a sample of other files. If there is no audit occurring right now…that means they’ve found the needle in the haystack and don’t need to proceed with an audit. If the internal audit doesn’t find anything, then a HFO hires a consultant for an external audit. You’ve got to think the soils/civil engineering company, architect, and general contractor all have these emails and county documents in their safe so they can leverage Gibson any time they want. Of course Gibson could offer-up the documents he holds himself right now instead of waiting for the lawsuit and the Request For Documents/RFD. He should be holding all the files for the ultimate disclosure for when he wants to sell his property.


90

Rita Neal once again covering up illegal activities of the special ones, looks like a raise for her is just around the corner.


82

First, gibson has always been arrogant, thinking he knows best. He has been in office far too long and needs to be voted out. He never should have been elected in the first place. VOTE HIM OUT!


113

That four attorneys declined to take Keely’s case because of Gibson’s “power” demonstrates two things: Gibson has been in office way too long, and he doesn’t shy from abusing his authority.


119

CAO Wade Horton has a history of turning a blind eye to incompetence and corruption. His appointees reflect that attitude. The Planning director worked directly under him in Administration before being appointed to Planning. A fish rots from the head.


70

With his crooked compatriot now gone, Gibson has doubled down on his self-serving actions. He’s in public service only to cater to his own private objectives. Jerks exist in both parties.


76

Just more of the standard “rules for thee but not for me” BS that the ruling class plays by. Amoral, unethical so called “leaders”. Notice how this attitude also bleeds into the bureaucrats who will lie to protect their bosses.


69

Rules for thee and not for me! This explains so much about Gibson and his arrogant attitude and voting record.


73
1 2 3 4