Tribune’s bias undeniable in SLO County supervisor race

October 24, 2022

By ERIK GORHAM

The Tribune’s latest editorial over the San Luis Obispo County District 2 race reads like a Bruce Gibson campaign flyer and not like an unbiased examination of the candidates. I wholly disagree with the editorial team’s conjectures.

For full disclosure, I am a member of the Bruce Jones for District 2 supervisor team and want to correct the record. When the head of the Republican Party compared Dr. Bruce Jones to Supervisor Debbie Arnold, he was referring to Dr. Jones’ integrity, intelligence, consideration for the needs of the public and congeniality.

Instead of noting what was said on a radio show, the Tribune editorial parrots Gibson’s campaign claiming that the comparison to Arnold makes Dr. Jones a Trumper and an election denier, both are untrue.

Continuing on with the inaccurate conjectures, the Tribune editorial board determined that Dr. Jones is on the wrong side of climate action because he wants to keep Diablo Canyon power plant open and has concerns with floating windmills off Morro Bay. Dr. Jones wants to keep Diablo Canyon open because it produces energy without releasing carbon.

Other than Gibson, almost every Democratic official in California supports keeping Diablo open to ensure a reliable energy source.

For more than a decade, Gibson and Hill pushed a 10-year plan to stop homelessness with a focus on case management. Gibson and Hill repeatedly voted to provide the nonprofit managing the program and the local shelter, who Hill’s girlfriend and then wife worked for, tens of millions of dollars. This was a time the Department of Housing and Urban Development, which provided the county homeless services funding, was promoting a housing first program that had much greater results.

Also during this time, SLO County had the second highest number of unhoused people per population in the country, demonstrating Hill and Gibson’s program did not work. Currently, SLO County is ranked third highest for the number of unhoused people.

As part of his campaign, Gibson has bragged about his success with homelessness. Dr. Jones pointed out the failures of the 10-year-plan and the Tribune editorial board wrote that Gibson was an alternate when he signed the 10-year-plan and was not responsible for the issues, which we believe is inaccurate as Gibson promoted and voted to fund it for a decade.

The misinformation is the reason multiple Republicans refuse to interview with the Tribune, you twist everything around as is manifested in your editorial.


Loading...
18 Comments
Inline Feedbacks
View all comments

Gee, and CCN is unbiased?


I sometimes see three anti-Gibson ads on CCN pages that have editorials or opinion pieces. Unfortunately, CCN does not separate its ads as most print newspapers do.


One of the first things you learn in journalism school is to attempt to stay unbiased. That’s why you never place a political advertisement on an editorial/opinion page, because it suggests bias.


For example, you will not see a Pro-Gibson ad on the editorial page of the Tribune (nor will you see political ads on the Tribune’s website), yet you will see Anti-Gibson ads right next door to CCN editorials such as this one.


In other words, this piece is a clear case of the pot calling the kettle black.


Good luck Mr. Jones. You’ll need it with idiots like Mr. Gorham on your side.


The “anti-Gibson” ads are served by google ads based on your ip/search history etc

Once our ads are served (daily) google fills in with other ads based on your internet history.


Edit: To be clear the Gibson campaign (or whomever) could run ads on google and appear here if they wanted, they are not blocked or anything.


Sorry people, ALL editorial pages of newspapers, print or online ARE opinion pieces. It’s always been that way. I don’t care if it’s the Trib, Wall Street Journal or Cal Coast News….. Sorry Mr. Gorham, I totally disagree that your reason that local Republican candidates refuse to interview with the Tribune is because it is a biased newspaper. Yes I agree it is a liberal leaning newspaper. But I am totally convinced that they refuse because they are afraid of hardball questions, which EVERY candidate by the way should answer. Both political parties. Everyone should be fed up with typical softball generic questions and answers by these local candidates.


I still buy that worthless rag, why you ask, for storys just like the one that came out yesterday about the homeless camp that the county set up on Kansas Avenue that capslo is suposed to work with people to get them housed, their track record is broken according the the person interviewed, the county is not doing much better to help, so where does all this money go that the BOS send to these groups.


Does anyone contest the salary and benefit packages of upper management? That’s why I would not vote for Gibson. The compensation of the top echeon in the County is too “d” high. Nothing about this in the Tribune.


Out of line compensation packages are not limited to the county, they are in most cities, CSDs, agencies and most levels of government.


The SLO Tribune hasn’t been remotely unbiased since Jeff Fairbanks died in ’95.


My thoughts exactly. When Jeff, Ann and their daughter — along with several others — died in November 1995, the heart of the old “T-T” died with them. Not that Jeff was some moderate, he was a liberal too, but understood the importance of being “fair.”.

Ann was their best writer and I believe the conscience of the paper.

Her stories pulled at the heart strings and brought a wealth of humanity and compassion to their reporting.

Immediately after they were gone, the paper starting losing its best reporters, one-by-one, and it has never fully recovered.

On another note, I believe that when the sports team — Eric, Dan and Pete — left, they made a huge mistake by letting their coverage of local sports teams — high school, Cuesta and Cal Poly — wither and die too.

They lost a huge number of readers with that conscious decision to quit covering local sports and not to replenish the sports desk staff.

That said, I read the paper daily too, and believe they do a pretty good job. The staff is still shorthanded, but doing a better job than one probably should expect.

With a full staff, they could do a better job of beat reporting. For example, as near as I can tell, there are no reporters assigned to the County beat, courts, SLO City, cops/fire or the North Coast.

What’s funny is that you could put together a really good editorial staff with the T-T reporters who left but are still in the area.


The piece by ERIK GORHAM is absolutely correct and the reason I will not pay anything to the tribune to read anything they print. Cal Coast News is the only news source that is accurate. Goodbye Tribune and good riddance…


My vote will go to Bruce Jones for all the right reasons.


I’ve been around a long time and I remember when the Tribune had some credibility. Today, the Tribune is so far left they are in the bleachers. At one time I had a subscription, today I don’t even read the on-line version. The Tribune needs to close, it has no current value as a news source.


So right. It isn’t even the fact that the Trib is so far left, its that it is a new source that has chosen a side and has hit its biases hard, sending them into every single piece it presents. That’s not news, and it is no longer considered a source of information. I haven’t looked at it in over a decade.


I have been known to use the Tribune’s candidate/proposition recommendations, whichever side they support I vote for the other side.