SLO County supervisors to vote on dropping support for Proposition 13

September 11, 2023

By KAREN VELIE

The San Luis Obispo County Board of Supervisors is scheduled to consider repealing its support of Proposition 13 and of the two-thirds vote required to raise taxes, even though they voted unanimously in February to support the taxpayer protections as part of its state legislative platform.

Under Proposition 13, property taxes can increase by no more than 2% per year unless the property changes hands. The law was put in place to help lower and middle-income residents who could be forced to sell their homes because of large increases in taxes.

While supervisors John Peschong, Debbie Arnold, Jimmy Paulding and Dawn Ortiz-Legg have voiced their support of Proposition 13, Supervisor Bruce Gibson has been an inconsistent opponent. After Gibson voiced his changing support of the county’s platform, Interim County Administrator John Nilon put a reconsideration of the board’s support of the taxpayer protections on the Sept. 12 board agenda.

Prior to his appointment to the board, Nilon made a donation to Gibson’s 2022 reelection campaign.

A twisted path to reconsideration

On Feb. 7, the board voted unanimously to include the taxpayer protections as item 14 and 15 in its state legislative platform. The legislative platform lists the supervisors’ goals and priorities for county staff and for its advocacy efforts to state legislatures.

“14. Oppose any measures or legislation that reduces the super-majority vote required to raise taxes from 2/3rd to 55%.

“15. Oppose any legislation or initiative that proposes to modify Proposition 13. Specifically, oppose any legislation or proposal that would establish a so-called “Split Roll” for property tax, which would thereby reduce protections for commercial property owners. Oppose any legislation that would further the effort to modify Proposition 13 in lieu of the ballot proposition.”

On Aug. 13, in response to ACA 1, a bill that seeks to lower the required voter threshold to raise taxes from a two-thirds majority to 55%, Supervisor Peschong asked the supervisors to discuss the proposed bill at a future meeting. Peschong lost his bid in a 3-2 vote, with Gibson, Ortiz-legg and Paulding voting not to discuss the topic.

On Aug. 17, Gibson was one of the leaders of a California State Association of Counties (CSAC) rally promoting ACA 1 in Sacramento.

On Aug. 22, Templeton resident Bruce Jones and Mike Brown of COLAB chastised Gibson for telling county residents he supports Proposition 13 while doing the opposite in Sacramento. Brown then accused Gibson, Paulding and Ortiz-Legg of attempting to suppress a public discussion of the bill.

Gibson responded, saying he did not remember exactly what was in the county’s legislative platform and that he was representing CSAC when he marched in front of the State Capitol. Gibson then said he wanted the board to revisit its support of taxpayer protections on the legislative platform because they need to allow the public to vote on these items.

The board, however, did not vote on Gibson’s request. Regardless, County Interim Administrator Nilon placed a reconsideration of the county’s state legislative platform on the Sept. 12 agenda with a suggestion the board consider amending items 14 and 15.

 


Loading...
18 Comments
Inline Feedbacks
View all comments

All the Politicians can think about is how to lie enough to get re-elected so they can give themselves outragious raises and try to get more of the taxpayers money so they can spend it on themselves.


When I got my property tax bill in 1978 the taxes were at least 2 or 3 times over the prior year. Later that year proposition 13 was on the ballot and was passed by the voters. Thus my property taxes were not increased. We all know what SLO County Supervisor(s) NOT to vote for!


I don’t want to repeat what I said when Jones’s opinion came out, but alas I bare this cross.


It makes total sense that Gibson would not be equally supportive of every aspect of the VERY large legislative platform. I know for a fact that supervisors Arnold and Peschong are not supporters of several provisions, so what! The document is a policy compromise wishlist, it’s not hypocritical for anyone on the Board, Gibson or Arnold, to vote for it. But if Gibson is a hypocrite, so are the right-wing supervisors. Pick.


This controversy is bologna, it’s revealed by all the criticism being laid on Gibson (derangement syndrome).


Also why are people upset that there wasn’t an ACA discussion then, but also upset that discussion is going to happen now?


Prop 13 is a sacred cow that should be left alone. BOS needs to get its fiscal house in order. Simply raising taxes should not be an option. Reducing overhead and expenditures is what their fiscal duty is. But instead you got Jimmy yelling out da window “we are doing a good job”


This vote would mean nothing to the hard working property tax payers of our county. They have no say in state law and are pandering to their base. But………there are plenty of sneaky ideas floating around the chambers of our state capital to chip away and diminish this tax protection called Prop 13. Renters and home owners alike enjoy the 2/3 voter majority threshold to raise property taxes. Mr. Jon Coupal of the Howard Jarvis Taxpayers Association continues to work everyday in the fight against those in Sacramento that want to extract more and more of your wealth and rent. Find his website and join the fight!


Anyone surprised?, Paulding can’t wait to get his hands on more of our money, he can’t spend it fast enough.


Hey, you, the SLOCO5, how about lowering excessive salaries and benefits.


Anymore, it seems that all politicians have become Charlatans who are ever greedy when it comes to the almighty dollar. Evil self-enrichment at its worst.

For the love of money is a root of all kinds of evil, for which some have strayed from the faith in their greediness, and pierced themselves through with many sorrows.


There is no end to the greed and treachery of these so called leaders.