SLO County supervisors to vote on dropping support for Proposition 13
September 11, 2023
By KAREN VELIE
The San Luis Obispo County Board of Supervisors is scheduled to consider repealing its support of Proposition 13 and of the two-thirds vote required to raise taxes, even though they voted unanimously in February to support the taxpayer protections as part of its state legislative platform.
Under Proposition 13, property taxes can increase by no more than 2% per year unless the property changes hands. The law was put in place to help lower and middle-income residents who could be forced to sell their homes because of large increases in taxes.
While supervisors John Peschong, Debbie Arnold, Jimmy Paulding and Dawn Ortiz-Legg have voiced their support of Proposition 13, Supervisor Bruce Gibson has been an inconsistent opponent. After Gibson voiced his changing support of the county’s platform, Interim County Administrator John Nilon put a reconsideration of the board’s support of the taxpayer protections on the Sept. 12 board agenda.
Prior to his appointment to the board, Nilon made a donation to Gibson’s 2022 reelection campaign.
A twisted path to reconsideration
On Feb. 7, the board voted unanimously to include the taxpayer protections as item 14 and 15 in its state legislative platform. The legislative platform lists the supervisors’ goals and priorities for county staff and for its advocacy efforts to state legislatures.
“14. Oppose any measures or legislation that reduces the super-majority vote required to raise taxes from 2/3rd to 55%.
“15. Oppose any legislation or initiative that proposes to modify Proposition 13. Specifically, oppose any legislation or proposal that would establish a so-called “Split Roll” for property tax, which would thereby reduce protections for commercial property owners. Oppose any legislation that would further the effort to modify Proposition 13 in lieu of the ballot proposition.”
On Aug. 13, in response to ACA 1, a bill that seeks to lower the required voter threshold to raise taxes from a two-thirds majority to 55%, Supervisor Peschong asked the supervisors to discuss the proposed bill at a future meeting. Peschong lost his bid in a 3-2 vote, with Gibson, Ortiz-legg and Paulding voting not to discuss the topic.
On Aug. 17, Gibson was one of the leaders of a California State Association of Counties (CSAC) rally promoting ACA 1 in Sacramento.
On Aug. 22, Templeton resident Bruce Jones and Mike Brown of COLAB chastised Gibson for telling county residents he supports Proposition 13 while doing the opposite in Sacramento. Brown then accused Gibson, Paulding and Ortiz-Legg of attempting to suppress a public discussion of the bill.
Gibson responded, saying he did not remember exactly what was in the county’s legislative platform and that he was representing CSAC when he marched in front of the State Capitol. Gibson then said he wanted the board to revisit its support of taxpayer protections on the legislative platform because they need to allow the public to vote on these items.
The board, however, did not vote on Gibson’s request. Regardless, County Interim Administrator Nilon placed a reconsideration of the county’s state legislative platform on the Sept. 12 agenda with a suggestion the board consider amending items 14 and 15.
The comments below represent the opinion of the writer and do not represent the views or policies of CalCoastNews.com. Please address the Policies, events and arguments, not the person. Constructive debate is good; mockery, taunting, and name calling is not. Comment Guidelines