Group sues San Luis Obispo County over endangered steelhead trout

August 25, 2024

By KAREN VELIE

Four environmental groups filed a lawsuit on Aug. 13 over alleged violations of the Endangered Species Act in federal district court to stop San Luis Obispo County from operating Lopez Dam in a manner that drives threatened species such as the steelhead trout to extinction.

In 1994, a citizen complaint alleged that the county was failing to release enough water from Lopez Dam for endangered fish in Arroyo Grande Creek below the dam as required by law. The State Water Resources Control Board then warned the county that it would not renew its water rights permit until it operated in line with the Endangered Species Act.

Three decades later, the county remains out of compliance.

In 2004, the county drafted a planning document outlining protective measures for endangered steelhead trout and California Red-Legged Frogs, but it was rejected by federal agencies which found it inadequate. Recently, the National Marine Fisheries Service found that the county was still out of compliance with the law.

To remedy the thirty years of ongoing violations, the plaintiffs in this case — San Luis Obispo Coastkeeper, Los Padres ForestWatch, California Coastkeeper Alliance and Ecological Rights Foundation — ask the court to ensure the county releases sufficient water from Lopez Dam at specific times of the year to support wildlife.

The plaintiffs are also demanding the county include provisions for securing fish passage past Lopez Dam so that Steelhead can access historic spawning grounds in the headwaters of Arroyo Grande Creek in Los Padres National Forest, and commit to other essential upstream and downstream habitat enhancement needs for endangered species.

“Steelhead have thrived in Arroyo Grande Creek and throughout San Luis Obispo County since time immemorial, but now they are faced with extinction,” said Benjamin Pitterle, Director of Advocacy for Los Padres ForestWatch. “This is now a unique opportunity for local leaders to commit to sensible measures that balance the needs of people with the needs of wildlife.”

Steelhead are a keystone species for the San Luis Obispo region. In the 19th century, the San Luis Obispo and Santa Ynez regions supported the largest runs of Southern steelhead throughout their range, likely between 20,000 to 30,000 adults per year.

Steelhead trout are also an important cultural resource. For thousands of years the Chumash and Salinan people coexisted with steelhead and honored the fish which they fondly called “Isha’kowoch.” Mexican and Spanish immigrants spread word of steelhead during the California goldrush. And by the early 1900s steelhead had become a popular game fish, and fisherman would flock from all over during the winter months to capture giant steelhead.

In recent decades, however, the number of adult anadromous steelhead has declined significantly, to the point that it is now rare to see them in the wild. Steelhead abundance has declined from a historic high of roughly 25,000 returning adults to fewer than 500.

Despite these losses, federal and state resource agencies have identified Arroyo Grande Creek and its tributaries as essential habitat for the survival and recovery of South-Central California Coast Steelhead.

 


Loading...
19 Comments
Inline Feedbacks
View all comments

Save the Steelhead. Let the money chasers make their money some other way.


Kick the homeless out of the creek, but don’t use them as an excuse to do nothing about the steelhead. Once that species is gone, they are not coming back.


The joke is on the wealthy who are thirsty for more money, that is they can’t take to their judgment day.


Everytime is rains and the trash and pollution caused by the homeless encampments along the creeks becomes more visible, I ask myself, “Whatever happened to the steelhead trout people?” Surely, the human waste, trash and God knows what else the creek dwellers dump in the water affects the endangered fish, as well? They never complain about that.


Dude, industrial ag is 1google times worse than homeless. I think you drank the PFAs water.


How much will it cost to try and bring this species back in Arroyo Grande Creek? Are other watersheds more viable for species recovery, such as the Santa Clara River or the pristine coastal creeks north of Cambria?


Good. They County should stay out of compliance. Lady thing we need is the state water board telling our County what do do with our most precious resource, drinking water. Such a racquet.


I know. Pickleball sucks.


This is one of those situations where bring back the other keystone species, the BEAVER, would do a world of good for the water levels and the survival of a fish that evolved with beavers in their environment. We have great new ways to remediate over-eager beavers now, and they do work for free. We should be reinstituting them into their environments asap, to save countless other animals and help prevent fires and floods. Without our biodiversity, we cannot ourselves thrive.


I too am a fan of the Beaver. Those furry little critters are amazing.


Donate to BeaverBrigade


SLO would go a long way in compliance if they would finally either install the planned fish ladder or tear out the Gage in Arroyo Grande. But for some reason they are dragging their feet……as usual.


Yeah, they’d rather lay shitty managers 6 figures and build mansions.


I loathe these non profits. They don’t really care about the things they say they do. Just about lining their pockets with the ‘non’ profits they receive from gullible followers.


Like churches?


It took 10 years of abuse to land by a few, to destroy 10 thousand years of nature, water tables and land, and stewardship of the natives who lived in and with nature.


Like the smelt, steelhead are in abundance in places like Minnesota…. the firehouses have fundraisers with them on the menu. So cry me a river.


No thanks. The last time steelhead ran the Salinas was in 2007, which sadly, is when wineries and breweries grew by something like 500 percent and gave no care about ecology. Other anglers; sports fisherman, people, rely on these creatures that can live for 20 plus years and spawn several times in and out of the ocean back to headwaters. Time to hold greedy people accountable for their sickening ecologic crimes. This is not Minnesota. I grew up here, am generational, and am damned to let steelhead who have been spawning here for 10 thousand years be ruined by a tiny Handful of psychopathic millionaires and corrupt politicians. My son deserves to see the miracle of steelhead in Atascadero, Templeton and all Salinian tributaries even if rich developers cry a river.


Slosum…to clarify: the steelhead of SLO County, Oncorhynchus mykiss, is a different species than the steelhead of Minnesota. So, there is major decline in the Cen Cal steelhead population. Other regions around the States may have thriving populations of steelhead. Again, not the same species as the ‘bows of Minnesota.