Offshore wind energy is another problem, not the solution

January 27, 2025

Offshore wind energy protest in Morro Bay

OPINION by MANDY DAVIS

Okay folks, after over two years of listening to virtue signaling NGO’s, climate apocalypse shaming hipsters, politically driven energy opportunists and just plain ignorant-of-the-facts state and local political dignitaries, I’ve just about had it up to here!

I’m sick of digging myself out of the political mire on both sides and witnessing the shameful justification of a toxic and destructive technology in the pursuit of ample energy for humanity at all costs, and in the name of averting a climate change “catastrophe” and slowing global warming. When are folks gonna wake up to the fact that they are being played in their concerns, are being manipulated by fear and ignorance, and are being bought and paid for by an industry that is primarily owned by corporate giants who really don’t give a rats ass about the negative effects of their industry, and are in it solely for profit at the earth and its inhabitants’ expense.

I have been an environmental activist for decades, fighting for the ocean that I love and her inhabitants. I have risked my life doing so and will gladly do so again to save just one whale, just one innocent creature in the oceans from needless death and suffering.

I have researched the oceans and the impacts of various aspects of ocean industrialization for decades and in so doing have justifiably come to the conclusion that the industry of offshore wind in our oceans is an extreme example of the population being lied to about the negative impacts of all aspects of the industry so a small group of industrialists and politicians can benefit.

The amount of crucial information pointing to the industry’s negative environmental impacts, the extreme costs for buildout and operation, the variability and unreliability of the energy source, and the potential decimation of our current coastal economies being hidden is mind blowing, with huge sums of money invested in keeping the media towing the climate change line and NGO’s heralding the industry as our “solution” for our growing apocalyptic visions and fears. I say bullshit!

Even if you do not want to see the distinct correlation between the death of marine mammals and fish in areas of offshore wind surveying and construction. Even if you do not choose to see the overall picture of an industry whose total carbon footprint is disturbingly huge. Even if you don’t want to recognize the impact to our harbors and coastal towns from the industrial port buildout to accommodate the hundreds, if not thousands of turbines.

Even if you do not want to see that hundreds of miles of virgin forests will be destroyed to create new grid pathways for the industry, Even if you do not want to question the billions of dollars spent to build and maintain a largely experimental technology. Even if you don’t want to recognize the growing need for toxic and dangerous battery storage facilities needed to control such a variable energy source output. Here is one thing you can not ignore…offshore wind “farms,” as they so euphemistically are called, are one of the most polluting energy sources known to man.

Studies show that the constant breakdown of the turbine blades into the ocean below is releasing significant quantities of Bisphenol (BPA) into the ocean, poisoning the entire water column and affecting biosystems, including humans in most alarming ways.

Studies show that the constant leak of sulphur hexafluoride into the atmosphere is contributing to greenhouse emissions at a rate of over 23,000 times that of CO2 and at this time is unmitigatable.

Studies show that the petroleum used to build and maintain the turbines, build and maintain the industrial ports, and build and maintain the fleet of ships exclusively designed to serve the offshore wind industry is significant enough to negate any possible global benefit to climate change.

In other words, studies show that the increase in shipping traffic, the increase in high decibel anthropogenic noise, the decrease in upwelling, and the industrial pollution associated with ports are quite possibly not the worst of the impacts to our oceans…the actuality of poisoning our coastal waters is real and something that cannot be justified and can not be ignored.

To poison our air and waters unnecessarily in the name of saving our world from an environmental disaster broadly named climate change and global warming makes no sense whatsoever. Are we to be so ridiculously short sighted as to allow for the destruction of our oceans in the name of proliferating an industry that will become obsolete within decades, will not mitigate global warming and will not ultimately serve humanity’s increasing need for responsible and reliable energy.

Think about it! It’s you and your children’s legacy and our planet’s future. Look past the lies and realize that offshore wind is not even close to “the answer” for our energy needs and our planet’s ability to thrive.

PS: If you see this opinion piece as an opportunity to claim these are the rantings of a climate denier and ultra right wing-nut…think again. Just because I don’t agree with the solution doesn’t mean I don’t see the problem!

Mandy Davis is the president of REACT Alliance and a Morro Bay resident. REACT Alliance is a local organization established to educate and inform the public about the issues involved with offshore wind.

 


Loading...
21 Comments
Inline Feedbacks
View all comments

NIMBY much?


I’m NIMBY to the max.


I get the distinct impression that some of the commentors did not read the article. Those who favor “wind” in general are not wrong, but to support anything that is presented, no matter how flawed, is certainly wrong. There are much better ways to utilize wind that come without the obvious flaws of this insanely expensive and unproven offshore model.


Do a little research into the “flower” tech that is currently being introduced. It works in a much wider velocities of wind, both very low and very high, without the destructive shredding of fiberglass and the ridiculous cost. They are actually somewhat attractive, work even more efficiently when grouped, are much shorter and are positioned on land. The higher efficiency also comes without the hideous noise facto that could only mean bad news for marine life. No need to destroy our coastline with outrageously large facilities and price tags.


Wake up people!!! This hideous project is, when one digs deep enough, the project of oil interests. It will take enormous amounts of oil to build and to service. The cost of all of this will be our responsibility. No real net environmental gain whatsoever, according to the Bureau of Ocean Energy Management (BOEM). NOT any sort of “win-win” for the people of our county or the Ocean and its life that we protect, which is, I pray, our common cause.


My issue is that I’m not persuaded by arguments that I believe boil down to justifications for raw NIMBYism. There is always an excuse, whether it’s the whales, the birds, or the trees. Addressing issues only creates a space for a new concern about the specifics. This is pretty clear when you see the Federal government restricting not some, but all new renewable energy developments. The desire to be anti-climate hippie has gone so far as to be just anti-energy. It’s hard to take concerns seriously when the real goal is to try and freeze everything in amber, denying the reality that things change.