Tribune shows bias in latest hit piece targeting Dan Dow

November 12, 2025

District Attorney Dan Dow

OPINION by JODY LANGFORD

As a longtime resident of San Luis Obispo County and a retired law enforcement officer, I am compelled to address the recent editorial written by Tribune staff and published in the Sacramento Bee and San Luis Obispo Tribune criticizing District Attorney Dan Dow. This hit piece lambasts Dow for reposting two social media items on X that critiqued New York City mayor-elect Mamdani.

The social media posts suggested that New Yorkers may have forgotten the lessons of 9/11. While the editorial rips Dow as hateful, divisive, and unprofessional, I say it is a stand for truth, remembrance, and free speech.

Here are the facts: DA Dow is a dedicated public servant with a proven track record of upholding justice in our county.

He shared posts that highlighted concerns about Mamdani’s past statements and affiliations, including his criticism of law enforcement and his anti-Israel sentiments. One repost specifically noted that electing such a figure in a city scarred by 9/11 displays troubling forgetfulness.

It does not mean that Mamdani himself had anything to do with 9/11 as the editorial ridiculously insinuated Dow meant. It just means that people with similar beliefs perpetrated the attack. They accuse Dow of being inflammatory but I wonder what is wrong with reminding citizens of historical tragedies when current events dictate it?

The editorial staff who wrote the opinion seem more intent on policing speech than examining substance. They accuse Dow of being partisan in his role as DA, but forget that he has First Amendment rights outside of his official duties.

This is not the first time Dow has been attacked for personal beliefs, yet they have failed to produce one instance where his personal beliefs have interfered with his prosecutions! He has always been about truth and justice.

Dow’s reposts were on his personal account and not an official proclamation. They align with his conservative views and prioritize national security and respect for law enforcement.

His views resonate here in San Luis Obispo County where he has prosecuted criminals with the truth being his guide and has been an advocate for victims. To castigate him for echoing widespread sentiments about 9/11 is selective outrage.

Dow seems to be fostering reflection, not hatred of Muslims. He appears to be cautioning us about people with the beliefs and track record such as Mamdani’s. The editorial goes overboard trying to frame legitimate concerns as bigotry. Mamdani’s election is New York City’s problem, but its implications regarding public safety and terrorism affect all of us.

The editorial is just another example of media bias against public figures who dare challenge progressive narratives. The Tribune and Bee are prioritizing political correctness over genuine discourse and, by doing so, are stoking controversy. Dow is not inciting violence or breaking any laws. He is merely exercising the most important freedom we have, the freedom of speech

I stand with Dow because his reposts are meant to make us accountable and not forget history. This makes him a true leader, someone we are very fortunate to have in his position.

We need to reject the editorial writers rush to judgement and open our minds to the wisdom being displayed by Dow. We deserve leaders like Dow who speak up without apology.

Jody Langford is a retired California Highway Patrol officer who lives in San Luis Obispo County.

 


Loading...
30 Comments
Inline Feedbacks
View all comments

Don’t buy into the Dow Smoke Machine. He’s trying to make a forward move in a blue state. He can’t run for Congress or go to Sacramento. He’ll obviously never be a judge. His best bet is for Trump to give him a federal appointment–one like Mike Stoker got years ago.


Except, Dan has been just like this since he was hired before Trump was elected by Americans.


Your flailing, does not make it true.


And 50 people were outraged.


Mamdami is not culturally American and it’s not racist to reject that in a public official. That doesn’t mean he shouldn’t be able to practice his religion, but his values aren’t American, and that’s why he shouldn’t be mayor. That’s why it’s shocking that New York seemingly forgot 9/11 which is what Dow was stating.


There are so many people here that didn’t even read what he shared and they’re still calling this “racism.” That word has no power any more because it’s never actually racism.


From what I’m reading here, I don’t believe that you are culturally American. I don’t think your values are American and I am not racist.


Not certain if you’re just writing in bad faith, but what were you reading that makes you think I’m not culturally American?


Imagine the outrage if Dow had stated that Israel is committing genocide in Gaza and practicing apartheid in the occupied Palestinian lands. Both true statements, by the way and not bigoted as the statements against Mamdani were. He would be savaged attacked, canceled and condemned


Prove anything you said, without using the made up word “palestine”.


As a genocide, Israel is doing it pretty lousy, since there are millions of people still alive in Gaza and the West Bank, as they concentrate on killing militant hamas members who pose a threat to peace.


Also, since when does an Apartheid government, allow their “enemies” to be members pf parliament, vote, own businesses, live anywhere they choose, go to any school, say what they want, love who they wish, and the freedom to travel anywhere?


No imagination needed, for reality.


You really need to do some reading outside of your bubble


Don’t forget Dow was also ripped by Judge Crandall, who is one of the most upstanding people I have ever met and respected by practically everyone who has ever met him. Dow fosters division and racism, because it appeals to racist hate-mongers and furthers his political aspirations.


Five comments out of fourteen at this time. Someone’s got their panties in a twist.


Nobody has anything to say about Judge Crandall’s position? I am stunned. “We don’t agree with those facts, so we are just going to ignore them.”


OK, I’ll say it. The Judge was wrong about what Dow reposted. That enough?


See, Crandall also expounded that Dow linked Mamdani to 9/11. As a Judge who is supposed to look at ALL the evidence, he quickly and fervently jumped to an erroneous conclusion.


The original post, that Dow shared, NEVER said ONE word about Mamdani being connected to 9/11. Not a thing. Other than, he is muslim, and islamic terrorists killed over 3000 people (that day, and subsequent illnesses acquired from the debris and toxins of the site), there is no connection. People, like you and Judge Crandall, have twisted that reality into a narrative lie that fits your leftist agenda.


We’re not ignoring facts. We’re ignoring you.