Independence Day versus San Luis Obispo’s fee increases

June 30, 2024

Stew Jenkins

OPINION by STEW JENKINS

Tuesday, two days before Independence Day, the San Luis Obispo City Council will consider adopting hundreds of huge fee increases. For instance the city fee for a development agreement will increase 210% to $59,621.

No wonder housing prices are so high. To keep folks from questioning decisions of, say the architectural review or planning commissions, an appeal to the City Council is slated to increase 341% from $797 to $3,512.

And if you are trying to build something but need to appeal an erroneous denial of your permit application for a needed structure that complies with city regulations, your fee to appeal to the City Council is proposed to increase to $8,611 (a 332% increase).

How about health and environmental actions at your home or business. Did your heater die? Replacing your heater requires a SLO City permit fee now of $489 (227% fee increase). Do you want to conserve water? A grey water system permit will now cost $622 (a 238% increase).

Want to insulate your building to reduce energy usage and save the planet? Your permit will cost $489 (a 239% increase). How about seismic strengthening for safety – the recommended increased permit fee goes up 449% ($57 to now $312, if approved).

There are new fees recommended on ordinary human activity or ordinary home improvements you might want to make to save the planet. But, to no doubt salve the conscience of those preparing the recommendation, a very few of the hundreds of SLO City Fees are recommend to be lowered – slightly.

The best example is this: I did not know that the City of San Luis Obispo requires that you pay a public dance permit fee if the spirit or the music moves you to grab your partner and dance down your street, or in the park. Well, inconveniently rising with inflation over the years that public dance permit now costs $125.36. The recommendation is to round it down by $1.36 to $124.

“Fees” are limited by the California Constitution and statutes to cover the actual cost of city provided services and goods, for instance, water.

What does John Q Public think the  cost of a piece of paper and printing out the public dance permit on a city computer printer amounts to? And, really, folks. Can anyone justify the city intervening in your lives by imposing, collecting, or enforcing a requirement that you get and pay for a permit to dance in public?

And let us circle back to those appeal fees. By the time you appeal, city staff has already prepared reports and bodies like the Architectural Review Commission have already issued their reasons for approving or denying a development or permit issuance. No justifiable extra cost is incurred  by city staff repeating their arguments in an appeal to the City Council.

Having brought a successful appeal to the City Council, I can attest that it is the person appealing to the City Council who has to incur the cost to provide documents, materials, evidence and arguments. It is the person appealing who is exercising their right under the U.S. and California Constitutions to petition for redress of grievances and to instruct their elected representatives.

No fee, let alone the current exorbitant fees, should ever be charged. Charging that fee impairs an appellant’s ability to exercise of that right to appeal to the San Luis Obispo City Council.

Show up July 2, at 5:30 p.m. at San Luis Obispo City Hall, 990 Palm Street, to urge the City Council to reject the recommendations and reduce or eliminate these unjustifiable fees and these nonsense permits restricting residents’ freedoms.

Stew Jenkins is an Attorney in San Luis Obispo who has been appointed repeatedly by the Superior Court as Special Master. His Law Office provides customized estate plans, represents commercial, industrial and farming land owners, and protects clients constitutional rights. His phone number is (805) 541-5763. He is the host of the weekly radio talk show, SLO County Public Policy and the Law, K-NEWS, FM 98.5.

 


Loading...
21 Comments
Inline Feedbacks
View all comments

Will the ELECTED city council members listen to those who voted them in?


LISTEN to their words while they deliberate.


WATCH their actions and whether or not they support the City or the residents who elected them.


Then VOTE accordingly.


These agreous fee increases possibly appear to be calculated based on City staff labor costs which are exorbitant salary and benefits which they already receive.


This means they are getting paid DOUBLE to do the job they were already getting paid to do!


Got to pay those salaries and benefits. Net effect, folks do things w/o permit.


Exactly – every contractor we’ve requested quotes from asks if we ‘want permits’. In past years, only the shadiest contractors used to ask such a thing, but now just about 100% do – simply because the cost and the bureaucracy is insane. My architect prices jobs differently if the work is permitted or not – because permitting adds significant cost without adding any value-added service. If the Bldg Dept lowered the cost, improved the approval speed and raised enforcement of unpermitted work, they’d generate far more money because so much work is unpermitted these days. My neighbor is spending hundreds of thousands on an interior remodel – his home is gated and nobody can see all the contractors – and it’s all unpermitted…and he figures he’s saving at least $10K in fees.


How this city has changed in the 55 years since I resided. Hard to believe. Citizens are second rate except for the newbies who can afford these wild new rates and prices from other areas.


Fees are all the rage right now, Paso Wine Alliwnce is pushing the wineries and consumers into a huge one. They may net a cool 10 million per year…. https://www.dropbox.com/scl/fi/f2bmynmbuww9ilo1cpa3w/SLOCWD-One-Pager-06.04.2024.pdf?rlkey=mphj1v6f8ucby1ddl8qggtcvg&dl=0


Alcoholic beverages are subject to alcohol excise taxes. For beer, still wines, sparkling hard cider it is a big whoppie of 20 cents per gallon. What a hassle to collect!! Abolish this silly tax!


Will this lunacy ever end??


Thank you, Stew Jenkins, for an excellent expose on how the City of San Luis Obispo operates: grow the staff and their salaries, charge individuals exorbitant fees to attempt to exercise their rights, rule against them, and take in more money to feed the machine.

The council and staff’s response is always to raise fees, parking charges, whatever comes to mind. And don’t even start on developer fees to create these box developments that are already falling apart (see San Luis Ranch story in this publication). We need a complete purge at city hall, not just council members but also staff who control the flow of information and approve all this. It can’t happen soon enough!


The fee increases are needed to cover their exorbitant administrative salaries and operating costs. How about reducing the overhead and leave the fees alone.


That would make business sense, something an owner would do to keep a customer base so a business will survive.

The problem is the city is not run by business owners who understand these concepts and the customers have no alternative but to deal with the governing entity.


Don’t forget their crazy retirement package they get…


I have a neighbor who wants to cut down a tree (and of a type the city doesn’t even allow new people to plant), but because it is over 12″ in diameter there is a $200 fee to the city.


This city is out of control.