Did SLO County supervisorial candidate launch smear campaign?

February 18, 2026

SLO County Supervisor Jimmy Paulding

By KAREN VELIE

In what appears to be a smear campaign, San Luis Obispo County Supervisor Jimmy Paulding accused his opponent Adam Verdin of violating campaign finance laws after learning the allegation was unfounded.

Tom Fulks, a political consultant who has worked for Paulding, said Verdin violated SLO County’s ordinance limiting campaign donations in a Feb. 12 Facebook post. Fulks accused Verdin of “thumbing his nose at the rules.”

“If his latest campaign finance report is to be believed, Verdin apparently has violated SLO County’s ordinance limiting campaign contributions to $5,900 for campaigns for county offices,” Fulks posted on Facebook. “But if it isn’t an error, who’s going to enforce the election rules here in SLO County? The state Fair Political Practices Commission? Sure, maybe, someday, in a year or three.”

Hours later, Chuck Bell, a retired attorney and Verdin’s commitee chair, set Fulks straight in a Facebook post.

“Fulks is a moron,” Bell wrote. “State law the SLO County Board of Supervisors adopted has long provided that contribution limits apply ‘per election’ with $5,900 for the ‘primary’ election and a separate $5,900 for the ‘general’ election. The contributions were perfectly legal.”

In his Form 460 campaign statement for July 1, 2025 through Jan. 31, 2025, Verdin’s top donation in the report was $11,800 from Covelop Inc., with half directed to the primary and the other half to the general election.

It is not uncommon for a donor to donate to both the primary and general elections.

Paulding, who is an attorney, led the charge to lower the limit in 2023 to lower limits from $25,000 to $5,900 per election.

And even though Bell, a former election law attorney, explained the law, Paulding filed a formal complaint on Feb. 15 with the California Fair Political Practices Commission accusing Verdin of violating the law. Paulding then announced his accusation on Facebook.

“Moments like this require steady, principled leadership at the local level,” Paulding wrote. “If you care about integrity in our elections and believe in transparent, accountable government, stand with our campaign today.”

Even though the law is clear that Verdin did not violate campaign finance laws, Paulding made a complaint that will likely not be addressed by the state until well after the election.

Because we believe the public needs the facts, the truth, CalCoastNews has not put up a paywall because it limits readership. However, we are seeking qualification as a paper of record, which will allow us to publish public notices, this requires 5,000 paid subscribers.

Your subscription will help us to continue investigating and reporting the news.

Support CalCoastNews, subscribe today, click here.

 


Loading...
23 Comments
Inline Feedbacks
View all comments

What this story seems to ignore is that unless another candidate files paperwork, this election will be over in June and there will be no runoff. This begs the question as to why the extra donation was given for an election that may or may not happen.


Have you ever created a budget for a project that may come up later, say in November, and begin with what finances may be needed and a tentative schedule? Then as time moves on you discover the potential project will not happen or be delayed until an undetermined date, you then can pause the schedule, reallocate any funds already reserved, or return them to the original location. Yes I know many times governments don’t work like that but that is a separate problem.


Anyone really surprised Paulding is involved in a smear campaign?


Paulding seems darn hypocritical in the manner he is twisting the rules for political reasons to cast aspersions on Verdin. He is not only a supervisor, he is an experienced attorney and should adhere to his candor duties. Sounds like he is trying to make something out of nothing.


Only a fool would buy in to Fulk’s absurd projectile at Verdin. Where was Fulks voice and opinion concerning Jan Marx, the Copelands, Booker and others who apparently were exposed for apparently conspiring against Ernie Dalidio to skunk his project (as reported by Ballotpedia) that then found its way into CCB’s hands and hundreds of homes built including one for Marx in the airport crash zone.


https://ballotpedia.org/County_of_San_Luis_Obispo_Dalidio_Ranch_Initiative,_Measure_J_(November_2006)


If Supervisor Paulding is just blowing smoke to create a smokescreen, some local entity needs to step up asap and make this right for Verdin. It feels like the ghost of Adam Hill will never go away or the consistent lying by our current Presidential administration has taken over SLO County candidates.


#NEVERVoteDemoNcratAgain


They have ALWAYS been THE evil TRAITORS amongst us.


#Vote4AdamVerdin


Paulding is a master manipulator. I believe this was just a stunt to harm his opponent. Paulding plays games every election, like suddenly claiming he supports the 2/3 vote to raise taxes portion of Prop. 15. Either Jimmy is to ignorant to understand the law, or he is lying to harm a competitor. Either way, it is time for him to go.


Do your homework on Paulding. He’s had life handed to him on a silver tray. Being a lawyer does not mean you are smart! Paulding rides on the shirt tails of the most corrupt. Vote for the honest guy!


Nor does being a lawyer mean one is honest, “candor duties” mentioned by Issac not withstanding.


Paulding is a disgrace to the profession and to his seat.


You are, of course, referring to his position on the BOS, and not his buttocks. On second thought, maybe it’s both.


That’s RICH, given that Adam Verdin inherited his wealth, was born on third base yet believes he’s hitting home runs, rides the coattails of his wife’s business AND, wait for it . . . is ALSO A LAWYER.


https://apps.calbar.ca.gov/attorney/Licensee/Detail/350747


If only there were natural consequences for being so unironically dumb.


Sounds to me that you are describing Jimmy Paulding. Had a house handed to him! And, it’s better to ride the coattails of his wife’s business, than those of the most corrupt leadership in SLO County!


Says the guy (JP) who hung out and worshipped Adam Hill.


“But if it isn’t an error, who’s going to enforce the election rules here in SLO County?…”


If it’s not an error, then what election rule is there TO enforce?


Fulks is a blowhard, and enjoys reading his own words, regardless how stupid they may be.


Tom Fulks is the devil incarnate!


#NEVERVoteDemoNcratAgain


American/Californian Patriot #Hispanics4Trump, #Hispanics4TRUERepublicans and the Rule of Law. ⚖️


POTUS DJT #45-47


Winning!


Fulks is a dangerous troll who hires even more dangerous unhinged trolls.